//
you're reading...
biodiversity, CCFG, Cultural Heritage, Deer, Forest Health, Forest Management, Member articles, News, ProSilva Ireland International Study trip, ProSilva Study tour

PRO SILVA POLAND VISIT 2015: An account of forest discussions

1.1

A recent report by ProSilva committee members Jonathan Spazzi with the collaboration of Kevin O’Connell (Teagasc), and Charlie Tailor (FC Scotland)

This visit took place between the 24 and 27 June as a joint effort of ProSilva Ireland and the Continuous Cover Forestry Group (CCFG) UK. During our visit networking and discussion between members of the two groups were a very positive feature and hopefully something that will continue in future tours.

ITINERARY

The tour was excellently hosted by Maciej Pach, Silviculturalist from the experimental forestry unit in the University of Agriculture, Krakow, Poland and took us to visit a range of remarkable forest in the south of Poland:

  • Experimental Forestry Unit (EFU) in Krynica Zdrój (Beskid Sadecki Mountains – the Carpathians)
  • “Łabowiec” reserve – a natural primeval forest composed of Abies alba and Fagus sylvatica and visit nearby Beech seed stands
  • “Obroźyska” reserve – A coppice with standards Lime (Tilia cordata) forest.
  • Szczawiczne – conversion of Scots pine nurse crop to stand composed of target tree species (Abies alba, Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies).
  • Mrokowiec – Abies alba stand managed by selection system
  • Krynica – visit a stand managed by the Swiss irregular shelterwood system – sightseeing

 

The sections below attempt to capture the main topics from the many discussions we had during our forest visits.

 

NATURE RESERVES

The Labowiec reserve has been left to evolve for the last 100 years with regular monitoring as way to learn about natural forest development processes. It is now a magnificent forest with both high levels of biodiversity and volumes of quality timber. It also seems very resilient: a sharp decline of silver fir took place some 10 years ago (acid rain?) and now seems to be making a come back. Dead wood is now 40-50% of stand volume. Increasing deer browsing is a growing problem as it removes most trees’ natural regeneration.

Reflections:

-the importance to designate long term stands – and monitor suitable stands for management learning

-the ability of a forest ecosystem to change/regulate species composition in response to environmental changes

-the importance of dead wood in ecosystem stability (biodiversity)

-the importance to control herbivory

2,1 2.2  2.3

 

SPECIES DIVERSITY

 

In most of the forest visits the management strategy relied on the strong ability of key species to regenerate under an existing canopy (shade tolerance ) such as silver fir, beech, norway spruce and sycamore. Also, a strong broadleaves component was always present as important for soil quality through its litter deposition.

 

3.1   3.2

 

Reflections

-important to select suitable shade tolerant species in mixtures with our (UK and Ireland) main species (SS,ash) for complex stand development (western red cedar, silver fir, norway spruce, hemlock, sycamore, beech)

-importance of a broadleaves component in conifer stands for soil nutrients cycle and biodiversity (= stability).

FOREST SUCCESSION AND TREE PLANTING

Of great interest was the Szczawiczne forest visit. Here foresters started from a green field site 60 years ago with the objective to establish a semi-natural forest (Abies alba, Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies ). Foresters instead of taking the “direct route” by planting target species took a “successional” route and  planted Scots pine as a nurse forest. 60 years later foresters are now “coupe” harvesting and regenerating (planting and natural regeneration) with beech, Norway spruce, sycamore and silver fir.

 

4.1   4.2

 

Reflections

-The importance of considering the long term natural development process when planting a green field site (soil biology development and micro-climate development) by using pioneer species stands or pioneer species in appropriate mixtures with later successional species.

-Is this a reason for a reported general poor performance of “climax” Irish broadleaves new plantations (oak, beech, sycamore) often planted pure on green field sites?

Untitled

At a Teagasc workshop in Ireland remediating techniques for poorly performing broadleaves plantations involves stumping back sections of plantations and singling the new shoots, as well as inter-planting with complementary species (alder). Results are promising with strong and quality regrowth due to microclimate and improved soil dynamics since planting.

 

CONCLUDING REMARKS

The tour was a very enjoyable experience and certainly a great success from a networking and a learning point of view. If we had to bring home four main point wewould highlight:

  • The great learning value of long term forest monitoring programmes.
  • The relative simplicity and flexibility of  the management system of apparently very complex stands.
  • The high level of species and structural diversity found within this timber production system that offers a great landscape and added value to the local community (well-being and tourism).
  • The comparative smaller scale of harvesting operations in complex stands that offers opportunities for large number of local people to get involved in the tending, harvesting and also enjoyment of the forest.
Advertisements

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email here to get updates, then hit the button

RSS News from ProSilva Europe

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
%d bloggers like this: